Hi Florian,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 05:14:46PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Commit 13535a3b40b62 ("files: restore base table skeletons") moved
> > config skeletons back from examples/ to /etc/nftables/ directory, but
> > ignored the fact that commit 6c9230e79339c ("nftables: rearrange files
> > and examples") added a new file 'netdev-ingress.nft' which is referenced
> > from 'all-in-one.nft' as well.
>
> Right. Do you think we should also add in inet-nat.nft example,
> or even replace the ipvX- ones?
Having an inet family nat example would be wonderful! Can inet NAT
replace IPvX-ones completely or are there any limitations as to what is
possible in rules?
Cheers, Phil
