Re: [PATCH nf-next] src: enable set expiration date for set elements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laura,

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Laura Garcia Liebana wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
> index 8394560aa695..df19844e994f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct nft_dynset {
>  	enum nft_registers		sreg_data:8;
>  	bool				invert;
>  	u64				timeout;
> +	u64				expiration;
>  	struct nft_expr			*expr;
>  	struct nft_set_binding		binding;
>  };
> @@ -51,16 +52,18 @@ static void *nft_dynset_new(struct nft_set *set, const struct nft_expr *expr,
>  	const struct nft_dynset *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
>  	struct nft_set_ext *ext;
>  	u64 timeout;
> +	u64 expiration;
>  	void *elem;
>  
>  	if (!atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size))
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	timeout = priv->timeout ? : set->timeout;
> +	expiration = priv->expiration;
>  	elem = nft_set_elem_init(set, &priv->tmpl,
>  				 &regs->data[priv->sreg_key],
>  				 &regs->data[priv->sreg_data],
> -				 timeout, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +				 timeout, expiration, GFP_ATOMIC);
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^

Probably better to replace 'expiration' by 0? priv->expiration is
never used / always set to zero, right?

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux