Hi Laura, On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Laura Garcia Liebana wrote: [...] > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c > index 8394560aa695..df19844e994f 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct nft_dynset { > enum nft_registers sreg_data:8; > bool invert; > u64 timeout; > + u64 expiration; > struct nft_expr *expr; > struct nft_set_binding binding; > }; > @@ -51,16 +52,18 @@ static void *nft_dynset_new(struct nft_set *set, const struct nft_expr *expr, > const struct nft_dynset *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr); > struct nft_set_ext *ext; > u64 timeout; > + u64 expiration; > void *elem; > > if (!atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size)) > return NULL; > > timeout = priv->timeout ? : set->timeout; > + expiration = priv->expiration; > elem = nft_set_elem_init(set, &priv->tmpl, > ®s->data[priv->sreg_key], > ®s->data[priv->sreg_data], > - timeout, GFP_ATOMIC); > + timeout, expiration, GFP_ATOMIC); ^^^^^^^^^^ Probably better to replace 'expiration' by 0? priv->expiration is never used / always set to zero, right? Thanks!