On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:13:46PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > This reliably triggered ENOBUFS condition in mnl_batch_talk(). With the > past changes, it passes even after increasing the number of rules to > 300k. Applied, thanks.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:13:46PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > This reliably triggered ENOBUFS condition in mnl_batch_talk(). With the > past changes, it passes even after increasing the number of rules to > 300k. Applied, thanks.