On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:44 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2019-05-28 19:00, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 6:26:47 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:54 PM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > > Mrunal Patel (maintainer of CRI-O) and I have reviewed the API, and > > > > believe this is something we can work on in the container runtimes team > > > > to implement the container auditing code in CRI-O and Podman. > > > > > > Thanks Dan. If I pulled this into a branch and built you some test > > > kernels to play with, any idea how long it might take to get a proof > > > of concept working on the cri-o side? > > > > We'd need to merge user space patches and let them use that instead of the > > raw interface. I'm not going to merge user space until we are pretty sure the > > patch is going into the kernel. > > I have an f29 test rpm of the userspace bits if that helps for testing: > http://people.redhat.com/~rbriggs/ghak90/git-1db7e21/ > > Here's what it contains (minus the last patch): > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/compare/master...rgbriggs:ghau40-containerid-filter.v7.0 Yes, exactly. Just as I plan to start making some test kernels for people to play with (assuming v6 looks okay), I think it would be good if Steve could make a test build of the latest audit userspace with the audit container ID patches. It really shouldn't be that hard, and the benefits should far outweigh any time spent generating the tree/builds. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
