On Saturday 2019-05-18 20:21, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote: >The patch series have been tested by enabling iptables and ip6tables SYNPROXY. >All the modules loaded as expected. What is the subsequent plan? Making new modules brings the usual module overhead (16K it seems), and if there is just one user, that seems wasteful. >$ lsmod | grep synproxy >IPv4 and IPv6: >nf_synproxy_ipv6 16384 1 ip6t_SYNPROXY >nf_synproxy_ipv4 16384 1 ipt_SYNPROXY >nf_synproxy_core 16384 4 ip6t_SYNPROXY,nf_synproxy_ipv6,ipt_SYNPROXY,nf_synproxy_ipv4 >nf_conntrack 159744 8 ip6t_SYNPROXY,xt_conntrack,xt_state,nf_synproxy_ipv6,ipt_SYNPROXY,nf_synproxy_ipv4,nf_synproxy_core,xt_CT > net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_synproxy_ipv4.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++ > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_synproxy_ipv6.c | 414 +++++++++++++++++