Re: [PATCH net-next,RFC 1/2] net: flow_offload: add flow_block_cb API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thu, May 09, 2019 at 06:39:50PM CEST, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>This patch renames:
>
>* struct tcf_block_cb to flow_block_cb.
>* struct tc_block_offload to flow_block_offload.
>
>And it exposes the flow_block_cb API through net/flow_offload.h. This
>renames the existing codebase to adapt it to this name.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

	
>+
>+void *flow_block_cb_priv(struct flow_block_cb *block_cb)
>+{
>+	return block_cb->cb_priv;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_block_cb_priv);
>+
>+LIST_HEAD(flow_block_cb_list);
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_block_cb_list);

I don't understand, why is this exported?


>+
>+struct flow_block_cb *flow_block_cb_lookup(u32 block_index, tc_setup_cb_t *cb,
>+					   void *cb_ident)

2 namespaces may have the same block_index, yet it is completely
unrelated block. The cb_ident


>+{	struct flow_block_cb *block_cb;
>+
>+	list_for_each_entry(block_cb, &flow_block_cb_list, list)
>+		if (block_cb->block_index == block_index &&
>+		    block_cb->cb == cb &&
>+		    block_cb->cb_ident == cb_ident)
>+			return block_cb;
>+	return NULL;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_block_cb_lookup);

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux