Re: Issue related to conntrack while insert new rule with conntrack command in linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, I'll check it out and let you know.
With best regards.Mojtaba

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:15 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:38:20PM +0430, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Hello all
> > I read man conntrack document guide. That is great.
> > I have a issue while i am working on it. For example i just want to insert
> > new rule in conntrack table like this:
> > conntrack -I -p udp -s 192.168.122.242 -d 192.168.122.103 --sport 5070
> > --dport 5005 -r 192.168.122.1 -q 192.168.122.103 --reply-port-src 1111
> > --reply-port-dst 2222 --timeout 30
> >
> > it successfully inserted but doesn’t work and traffic will be go to INPUT chain.
> > if i insert these two rules in iptables, the same above rules will be inserted
> > in conntrack table automatically and works correctly.(the traffic will
> > be traversed to 192.168.122.1 host)
> > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp -s 192.168.122.242
> > --dport 5005 -j DNAT --to 192.168.122.1:1111
> >
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p udp --dport 1111 -j SNAT --to
> > 192.168.122.103:2222
>
> Have a look at --dst-nat option, eg.
>
> conntrack -I -p udp -s 192.168.122.242 -d 192.168.122.103 --sport 5070 --dport 5005 --dst-nat 192.168.122.1 --timeout 30



-- 
--Mojtaba Esfandiari.S




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux