skb->dev is munged in setup_prerouting() to be bridge or vlan device on
top of bridge.
--Yes, but br_nf_pre_routing_finish will set the skb->dev back to the phyindev.
Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> 于2019年4月22日周一 下午5:35写道：
>
> Rundong Ge <rdong.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > br_nf_pre_routing will call the NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING hooks, at this
> > time both entry->state.in and entry->state.out are not bridge device.
> >
> > NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING, state->net, state->sk, skb,
> > skb->dev, NULL,
> > br_nf_pre_routing_finish);
>
> skb->dev is munged in setup_prerouting() to be bridge or vlan device on
> top of bridge.
>
> That being said, I think we need this fix at least:
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,15 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state,
> .size = sizeof(*entry) + route_key_size,
> };
>
> + if (skb_dst(skb)) {
> + skb_dst_force(skb);
> + if (!skb_dst(skb)) {
> + status = -EHOSTUNREACH;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> nf_queue_entry_get_refs(entry);
> - skb_dst_force(skb);
>
> switch (entry->state.pf) {
> case AF_INET:
>
>
> Then, why not add, in dev_cmp:
>
> dst = skb_dst(skb);
> if (dst && dst->dev->index == index ...
>
> ?
