Hi Phil,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:06:56PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> I was talking about the "osf name . osf version" part. If not optimized,
> each osf expression would perform a database lookup and return different
> parts of the fingerprint.
>
> Or did I miss your point?
Oops, sorry. I misunderstood.
I don't think we should split this in two separated selectors.
Matching on 'osf version' alone itself does not make sense to me.
I think it's useful to match on:
* genre
* genre:version
* genre:version:subtype
anything else for this, I don't have a use case.
We can achieve something similar to what you suggest in your 'osf name
. osf version' example via:
osf version { "Linux:2.4", "Windows\*" }
Thanks!
