On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:29:26PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > Not related to this patch: IIRC this echo support is not using the > nlmsg_seq to correlate the command and the result that we obtain, > right? Telling this because this should work with a batch that > contains several requests to create rules, then use this sequence > number to correlate things the reply with the original rule creation > command. I think you once suggested that and I promised to look into it. :) So I just did and while nlmsg_seq would serve nice to clearly identify which command a returned handle belongs to, I don't know how to map the command back to the JSON object from which it was created. Cheers, Phil
