Re: [PATCH][nf-next] netfilter: Use RCU primitives under RCU protected data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/24/2019 07:32 PM, Li RongQing wrote:
> This pointer is RCU protected, so proper primitives should be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/xt_CT.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> index 0fa863f57575..26dee8bba326 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_CT.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ xt_ct_set_helper(struct nf_conn *ct, const char *helper_name,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	help->helper = helper;
> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(help->helper, helper);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int xt_ct_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par,
>  err4:
>  	help = nfct_help(ct);
>  	if (help)
> -		nf_conntrack_helper_put(help->helper);
> +		nf_conntrack_helper_put(rcu_dereference(help->helper));

Are you sure it is ok, have you tested your patch ?

Where is the rcu_read_lock() ?

CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y  will likely give a splat here.

>  err3:
>  	nf_ct_tmpl_free(ct);
>  err2:
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void xt_ct_tg_destroy(const struct xt_tgdtor_param *par,
>  	if (ct) {
>  		help = nfct_help(ct);
>  		if (help)
> -			nf_conntrack_helper_put(help->helper);
> +			nf_conntrack_helper_put(rcu_dereference(help->helper));

Same here.

>  
>  		nf_ct_netns_put(par->net, par->family);
>  
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux