Hi Pablo, On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:51:34PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > According to RFC4291, IPv6 prefixes are represented in CIDR notation. > > While the use of a "netmask" notation is not explicitly denied, its > > existence merely stems from applying IPv4 standards to IPv6. This is not > > necessarily correct. > > > > Therefore change printing of IPv6 prefixes to use CIDR notation as long > > as the address mask's bits are left contiguous. > > Applied, thanks. > > Only affects -L listing, right? I think people should not be scraping > that output. No, this is effective for ebtables-save, too. Feel free to revert if you consider that unacceptable, I'll adjust ebtables-nft output into the opposite direction then. :( Cheers, Phil
