On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:39:40PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Chieh-Min Wang <chiehmin18@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think this is the same issue as this one. > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/995825/ > > Yes, likely. I see. I don't think letting the packet go through is a good idea. Not sure NAT will work fine, packets would go through being unmangled? I think we should still drop the packet until we fix this.
