Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Most of the time these were the same value anyway, but when > CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled we would use a smaller number of locks to > reduce overhead. Unfortunately having two values is confusing and not > worth the complexity. Agree. > This fixes a bug where tree_gc_worker() would only GC up to > CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS trees which meant when CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled > not all trees would be GCed by tree_gc_worker(). Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
