Re: [PATCH RFC] src: support for arp ether and IP source and destination fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:05:15PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add ip-saddr, ip-daddr, ether-saddr, ether-daddr for arp, eg.
> > 
> >  # nft add table arp x
> >  # nft add chain arp x y { type filter hook input priority 0\; }
> >  # nft add rule arp x y arp ip-saddr 192.168.2.1 counter
> 
> 'arp {ip,ether} {s,d}addr' would create ambiguities?

That's my concern moving forward with the grammar, but I can double
check more carefully. I just quickly jumped on this when looking at
one of the bugzilla issues.

> If so, this '-' notation seems ok to me.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux