On 08/07/2018 01:26 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 07-08-18 13:19:26, Florian Westphal wrote: >> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I can't reproduce it anymore. >>>> If i understand correctly this way memory allocated will be >>>> accounted to kmem of this cgroup (if inside cgroup). >>> >>> s@this@caller's@ >>> >>> Florian, is this patch acceptable >> >> I am no mm expert. Should all longlived GFP_KERNEL allocations set ACCOUNT? > > No. We should focus only on those that are under direct userspace > control and it can be triggered by an untrusted user. Looks like the description in include/linux/gfp.h could use some details to guide developers, possibly also Mike's new/improved docs (+CC). >> If so, there are more places that should get same treatment. >> The change looks fine to me, but again, I don't know when ACCOUNT should >> be set in the first place. > > see above. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
