Re: [PATCH v3 nft] Set/print standard chain priorities with textual names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:22:23PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:14:20PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:26:37AM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> > > > > > By the way, there's a question I haven't met yet. Prio spec is used by not only
> > > > > > hook_spec but also flowtable_block. Are these standard priorities applicable for
> > > > > > flowtable priorities? Or should I make it specific to chains?
> > > > 
> > > > Only the filter priority you can apply to the flowtable_block.
> > > 
> > > Is there a man page you could recommend to read more about flowtables? Maybe one
> > > of an older tool? I haven't find much about this.
> > 
> > man nft.
> > 
> > There is also: Documentation/networking/nf_flowtable.txt
> 
> But these don't say anything about filter or anything.. I'd like to see if it
> makes any sense here. It seems not to make any for now. How about leaving
> flowtables alone with this change and only apply this for chains?

flowtables can be only beplaced at ingress. And there is only 'filter'
chains there at this stage. So taking filter as 0 there is just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux