[PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_conntrack: resolve clash for matching conntracks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch enables the clash resolution for NAT (disabled in
"590b52e10d41") if clashing conntracks match (i.e. both tuples are equal)
and a protocol allows it.

The clash might happen for a connections-less protocol (e.g. UDP) when
two threads in parallel writes to the same socket and consequent calls
to "get_unique_tuple" return the same tuples (incl. reply tuples).

In this case it is safe to perform the resolution, as the losing CT
describes the same mangling as the winning CT, so no modifications to
the packet are needed, and the result of rules traversal for the loser's
packet stays valid.

Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <martynas@weave.works>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 3465da2a98bd..cc5ef8c9d0da 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -502,6 +502,18 @@ nf_ct_key_equal(struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h,
 	       net_eq(net, nf_ct_net(ct));
 }
 
+static inline bool
+nf_ct_match(const struct nf_conn *ct1, const struct nf_conn *ct2)
+{
+	return nf_ct_tuple_equal(&ct1->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
+				 &ct2->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple) &&
+	       nf_ct_tuple_equal(&ct1->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
+				 &ct2->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple) &&
+	       nf_ct_zone_equal(ct1, nf_ct_zone(ct2), IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) &&
+	       nf_ct_zone_equal(ct1, nf_ct_zone(ct2), IP_CT_DIR_REPLY) &&
+	       net_eq(nf_ct_net(ct1), nf_ct_net(ct2));
+}
+
 /* caller must hold rcu readlock and none of the nf_conntrack_locks */
 static void nf_ct_gc_expired(struct nf_conn *ct)
 {
@@ -696,18 +708,21 @@ static int nf_ct_resolve_clash(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
 	const struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto;
 
+	enum ip_conntrack_info oldinfo;
+	struct nf_conn *loser_ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &oldinfo);
+
 	l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct), nf_ct_protonum(ct));
 	if (l4proto->allow_clash &&
-	    ((ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK) == 0) &&
 	    !nf_ct_is_dying(ct) &&
 	    atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)) {
-		enum ip_conntrack_info oldinfo;
-		struct nf_conn *loser_ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &oldinfo);
-
-		nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, loser_ct);
-		nf_conntrack_put(&loser_ct->ct_general);
-		nf_ct_set(skb, ct, oldinfo);
-		return NF_ACCEPT;
+		if (((ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK) == 0) ||
+		    nf_ct_match(ct, loser_ct)) {
+			nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, loser_ct);
+			nf_conntrack_put(&loser_ct->ct_general);
+			nf_ct_set(skb, ct, oldinfo);
+			return NF_ACCEPT;
+		}
+		nf_ct_put(ct);
 	}
 	NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, drop);
 	return NF_DROP;
-- 
2.18.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux