Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> wrote: [ sorry for duplicate ] > On Wednesday 2018-06-27 13:33, Florian Westphal wrote: > > >This adds a clear distinction between old iptables (formerly > >xtables-multi, now xtables-legacy-multi) and new iptables > >(formerly xtables-compat-multi, now xtables-nft-multi). > > > >Users will get the ip/ip6tables names via symbolic links, having > >a distinct name postfix for the legacy/nft variants helps to > >make a clear distinction, as iptables-nft will always use > >nf_tables and iptables-legacy always uses get/setsockopt wheres > >"iptables" could be symlinked to either -nft or -legacy. > > So it ultimately falls into the hands of the packager (at the distro level) > what to make iptables a symlink to. I like that.. > > > >-# nftables compatibility layer > >+# nftables nfibility layer > > nfibility!? Thanks for spotting, I'll fix this up and make sure there are no other mismangled lines. > >+.nf > >+ /sbin/iptables -> /sbin/iptables-legacy-multi > >+ /sbin/ip6tables -> /sbin/ip6tables-legacy-mulit > >+ /sbin/iptables-save -> /sbin/ip6tables-legacy-mulit > >+ /sbin/iptables-restore -> /sbin/ip6tables-legacy-mulit > >+.fi > > more \- encoding needed here in the .nf block Indeed, thanks Jan, I'll fix this and the other places. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
