[nft PATCH] nft.8: Drop misleading adjective 'absolute'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Discussion showed that rule index may be interpreted as being absolute
or relative, so just drop this adjective without replacement.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
---
 doc/nft.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/nft.xml b/doc/nft.xml
index ab94bff447326..05193e67ed6dc 100644
--- a/doc/nft.xml
+++ b/doc/nft.xml
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ add table inet mytable
 		<para>
 			The <literal>add</literal> and <literal>insert</literal> commands support an optional
 			location specifier, which is either a <replaceable>handle</replaceable> of an existing
-			rule or an absolute <replaceable>index</replaceable> (starting at zero).  Internally,
+			rule or an <replaceable>index</replaceable> (starting at zero).  Internally,
 			rule locations are always identified by <replaceable>handle</replaceable> and the
 			translation from <replaceable>index</replaceable> happens in userspace. This has two
 			potential implications in case a concurrent ruleset change happens after the translation
-- 
2.17.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux