[PATCH 37/51] netfilter: nf_tables: always use an upper set size for dynsets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>

nft rejects rules that lack a timeout and a size limit when they're used
to add elements from packet path.

Pick a sane upperlimit instead of rejecting outright.
The upperlimit is visible to userspace, just as if it would have been
given during set declaration.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
index 04863fad05dd..5cc3509659c6 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static void *nft_dynset_new(struct nft_set *set, const struct nft_expr *expr,
 	u64 timeout;
 	void *elem;
 
-	if (set->size && !atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size))
+	if (!atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, set->size))
 		return NULL;
 
 	timeout = priv->timeout ? : set->timeout;
@@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ static int nft_dynset_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto err1;
 
+	if (set->size == 0)
+		set->size = 0xffff;
+
 	priv->set = set;
 	return 0;
 
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux