Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Close race between {un, }register_netdevice_notifier and pernet_operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30.03.2018 18:00, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:03:15 +0300
> 
>> the problem is {,un}register_netdevice_notifier() do not take
>> pernet_ops_rwsem, and they don't see network namespaces, being
>> initialized in setup_net() and cleanup_net(), since at this
>> time net is not hashed to net_namespace_list.
>>
>> This may lead to imbalance, when a notifier is called at time of
>> setup_net()/net is alive, but it's not called at time of cleanup_net(),
>> for the devices, hashed to the net, and vise versa. See (3/3) for
>> the scheme of imbalance.
>>
>> This patchset fixes the problem by acquiring pernet_ops_rwsem
>> at the time of {,un}register_netdevice_notifier() (3/3).
>> (1-2/3) are preparations in xfrm and netfilter subsystems.
>>
>> The problem was introduced a long ago, but backporting won't be easy,
>> since every previous kernel version may have changes in netdevice
>> notifiers, and they all need review and testing. Otherwise, there
>> may be more pernet_operations, which register or unregister
>> netdevice notifiers, and that leads to deadlock (which is was fixed
>> in 1-2/3). This patchset is for net-next.
> 
> I am applying this series and skipping the rwsem revert.
> 
> Thanks Kirill.

Thanks, David.

I'll send the fixing patch soon today.

Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux