On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:42:15PM +1300, Bernie Harris wrote: > Currently ebtables assumes that the revision number of all match > modules is 0, which is an issue when trying to use existing > xtables matches with ebtables. The solution is to modify ebtables > to allow extensions to specify a revision number, similar to > iptables. This gets passed down to the kernel, which is then able > to find the match module correctly. > > To main binary backwards compatibility, the size of the ebt_entry > structures is not changed, only the size of the name field is > decreased by 1 byte to make room for the revision field. Applied, thanks Bernie. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
