Hi Pablo, On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > This is clashing with existing fixes in nf.git. Crap! :) TBH, I never know which kernel to test against. Candidates usually are nf-next, nf, net-next and sometimes even net. Probably business as usual, or do you have a suggestion as to what I should "default" to? Maybe I should allow for alternative kernels in my testing VM also. > I think the backend selection needs a rework, this is the idea: > > 1) Register all set_ops in one single list (instead of the _type thing). > 2) Iterate over the list of _ops, select the one that fits better. > > The idea is to remove the _type, and expose all _ops to the set > backend selection. So we don't need this workarounds on the select_ops > code specifically. > > I would suggest a patch on top of what we have in nf.git (but that > would go for nf-next.git, I telling this because nf-next.git still > doesn't have the fixes that Florian made for this). OK, I'll have a look. Thanks, Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html