Re: [PATCH v2] net: netfilter: Replace printk() with appropriate pr_*() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joe,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 01:11 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > Using pr_<loglevel>() is more concise than
> > printk(KERN_<LOGLEVEL>).
> > Replace printks having a log level with the appropriate
> > pr_*() macros.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > changes in v2
> > *in v1 printk() were replaced with netdev_*()
> 
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c      | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c    | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.c | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c            | 2 +-
> >  net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c        | 4 ++--
> >  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> None of these files have a #define for pr_fmt so this
> should be OK.

I think Arushi could add pr_fmt in the same go, so we skip another
follow up patch for this. @Arushi: I suggested this in my previous
email, please have a look.

This would also probably allows us to save the line break in the error
message, which IIRC is not a good practise either, eg.

				pr_warn("nf_queue: OOM "
					"in mangle, dropping packet\n");

> Perhaps coalesce the formats and remove the unnecessary periods too.

Yes, removing periods seems fine.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux