From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
The IPS_NAT_MASK check in 4.12 replaced previous check for nfct_nat()
which was needed to fix a crash in 2.6.36-rc, see
commit 7bcbf81a2296 ("ipvs: avoid oops for passive FTP").
But as IPVS does not set the IPS_SRC_NAT and IPS_DST_NAT bits,
checking for IPS_NAT_MASK prevents PASV response to be properly
mangled and blocks the transfer. Remove the check as it is not
needed after 3.12 commit 41d73ec053d2 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack:
make sequence number adjustments usuable without NAT") which
changes nfct_nat() with nfct_seqadj() and especially after 3.13
commit b25adce16064 ("ipvs: correct usage/allocation of seqadj
ext in ipvs").
Thanks to Li Shuang and Florian Westphal for reporting the problem!
Reported-by: Li Shuang <shuali@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: be7be6e161a2 ("netfilter: ipvs: fix incorrect conflict resolution")
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
index 3e17d32b629d..58d5d05aec24 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_out(struct ip_vs_app *app, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
buf_len = strlen(buf);
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
- if (ct && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) {
+ if (ct) {
bool mangled;
/* If mangling fails this function will return 0
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
