Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] netfilter: nf_flow_table: in flow_offload_lookup, skip entries being deleted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Preparation for sending flows back to the slow path
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> index 5a81e4f771e9..ff5e17a15963 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,21 @@ struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *
>  flow_offload_lookup(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
>  		    struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple)
>  {
> -	return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&flow_table->rhashtable, tuple,
> -				      nf_flow_offload_rhash_params);
> +	struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *tuplehash;
> +	struct flow_offload *flow;
> +	int dir;
> +
> +	tuplehash = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&flow_table->rhashtable, tuple,
> +					   nf_flow_offload_rhash_params);
> +	if (!tuplehash)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
> +	flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> +	if (flow->flags & (FLOW_OFFLOAD_DYING | FLOW_OFFLOAD_TEARDOWN))
> +		return NULL;

Why not just check from _hook() function that this flow is in teardown
mode, so we can just skip this, it will be just a single extra branch
on that path.

> +
> +	return tuplehash;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flow_offload_lookup);
>  
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux