Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rateest_hash is supposed to be protected by xt_rateest_mutex, > and, as suggested by Eric, lookup and insert should be atomic, > so we should acquire the xt_rateest_mutex once for both. > > So introduce a non-locking helper for internal use and keep the > locking one for external. Looks good, thanks Cong. Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
