Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: do not allow empty names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 07:41 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Syzbot reported a WARN() in proc_create_data() [1]
> > 
> > Issue here is that xt_hashlimit does not check that user space provided
> > an empty table name.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c |    2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> > index 5da8746f7b88ff4c9446f256e542e823a6a561b0..eae732e013df92a364b500645360d4606c283a75 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
> > @@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
> >  			return -ERANGE;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!name[0])
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  	mutex_lock(&hashlimit_mutex);
> >  	*hinfo = htable_find_get(net, name, par->family);
> >  	if (*hinfo == NULL) {
> 
> I wonder if we should also check if name includes a '/' ?
> 
> if (!name[0] || strchr(name, '/'))
>     return -EINVAL;

I think there should be a helper for this to reject

- 0 length
- /
- .
- ..

in hashlimit case name is IFNMASIZ so we could even use
dev_valid_name() here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux