Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 3/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: randomize 32-bit ID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't leak the kernel pointer to userspace by adding a random seed. If
> you want a unique conntrack ID, used the new CTA_ID64 attribute.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> index 7aecb8ae5ecc..9a3357eeecdc 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  
>  static char __initdata version[] = "0.93";
> +static u32 nf_ct_seed __read_mostly;
>  
>  static int ctnetlink_dump_tuples_proto(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  				const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
> @@ -444,9 +445,19 @@ static int ctnetlink_dump_ct_seq_adj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct)
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> +static u32 nf_ct_id32(const struct nf_conn *ct)
> +{
> +	u32 id = (u32)(unsigned long)ct;
> +
> +	if (!nf_ct_seed)
> +		nf_ct_seed = get_random_u32();
> +
> +	return id + nf_ct_seed;
> +}

If we have the 64bit id, why not use it instead of ct address?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux