Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On ons, 2017-10-25 at 20:20 +0200, Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio wrote:
> > On ons, 2017-10-25 at 19:57 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > After upgrading to nftables 0.8 (from 0.7) on one of my systems,
> > > > I've
> > > > experiences several cases where rules that used to work fine with
> > > > 0.7
> > > > sometimes doesn't match anymore with 0.8 (it's not consistent -
> > > > sometimes the rules do match with 0.8).
> > > >
> > > > The rule chains end with a log statement before rejecting or
> > > > dropping
> > > > the packets, and I can see in the log that everything is as
> > > > expected
> > > > and the rules should match. After downgrading to nftables 0.7
> > > > everything works again.
> > >
> > > Are those errors restricted to a particular table family, chain or
> > > protocol?
> >
> > So far I've only registered it for IPv4 input filtering for TCP, but
> > that's also most of the traffic on this system, so I'm not sure that
> > it's limited to that.
> >
> > As mentioned, it's not consistent. A rule that has worked fine could
> > suddenly stop working without any rule set changes for days. Some
> > times
> > it has helped to just reload the exact same rule set. Other times
> > changing
> >
> > tcp dport { imap2, imaps } flow table imap \
> > { ip saddr & 255.255.255.240 \
> > timeout 5m limit rate 10/minute } \
> > counter accept
> >
> > to
> >
> > tcp dport { imap2, imaps } flow table imap \
> > counter accept
> >
> > or
> >
> > tcp dport { domain, http, https, 8080, 8443, 9091 } \
> > meta iif eth1 accept
> >
> > to
> >
> > tcp dport { domain, http, https, 8080, 8443, 9091 } \
> > meta iif eth1 counter accept
> >
> > has resolved it, but it feels like it wasn't really due to the
> > changes,
> > but more random luck.
note that sets are broken with 16bit elements at the moment in 4.13, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/821080/
or
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/830236/
> One more thing, I just noticed is that if I try to use nftables 0.7 to
> dump the rule set that was loaded with 0.7, I get the following error:
>
> # nft list ruleset
> nft: payload.c:550: payload_expr_expand: Assertion `desc->base == expr->payload.base' failed.
> Aborted
Crap, I'll fix this, thanks for reporting.
> If I use 0.8 to dump the rule set that was loaded with 0.7, I get the
> correct rule set except for a difference with regards to sets and maps
> that use interfaces like:
>
> --- nft-0.7-0.8 rule set loaded with 0.7 and dumped with 0.8
> +++ nft-0.8 same rule set loaded and dumped with 0.8
> @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
> chain prerouting {
> type filter hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept;
> iif "lo" accept
> - ct mark set iif map { 33554432 : 0x00000001, 67108864 : 0x00000002 }
> + ct mark set iif map { "eth0" : 0x00000001, "eth2" : 0x00000002 }
> iif "eth1" jump prerouting_internal
> - iif { 33554432, 67108864 } ip saddr { 0.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 224.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 } counter packets 6 bytes 705 drop
> + iif { "eth0", "eth2" } ip saddr { 0.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 224.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 } counter packets 0 bytes 0 drop
I will look at this too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
