Re: [PATCH nf 0/2] netfilter: nat: do not use rhltable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 01:55:36PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:39:50PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > This reverts the conversion of the nat bysource table to rhlist that
> > I did last year.
> > 
> > It was a bad idea to begin with.
> > 
> > Fast lookup is not essential; in most cases there is no lookup
> > at all because original tuple is not taken and can be used as-is.
> > What needs to be fast is insertion and deletion.
> > 
> > With rhlist, deletion is slow as it requires a list traversal.
> > So, switch back to a statically-sized table for bysource hash.
> 
> Series applied.
> 
We've hit this issue in production on Linux 4.9. Even though that's
just a "performance" fix (as opposed to actual crash), I believe it's
worth queuing it up to -stable (without it we've seen several freezes
of 20 seconds and more).

Patch #1 needs minor editing before applying to 4.9. Not sure if
patch #2 is worth backporting though. What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux