[PATCH 13/47] netfilter: nf_tables: No need to check chain existence when tracing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>

nft_trace_notify() is called only from __nft_trace_packet(), which
assigns its parameter 'chain' to info->chain. __nft_trace_packet() in
turn later dereferences 'chain' unconditionally, which indicates that
it's never NULL. Same does nft_do_chain(), the only user of the tracing
infrastructure. Hence it is safe to assume the check removed here is not
needed.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_trace.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_trace.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_trace.c
index e1b15e7a5793..0c3a0049e4aa 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_trace.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_trace.c
@@ -217,14 +217,11 @@ void nft_trace_notify(struct nft_traceinfo *info)
 	if (trace_fill_id(skb, pkt->skb))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
-	if (info->chain) {
-		if (nla_put_string(skb, NFTA_TRACE_CHAIN,
-				   info->chain->name))
-			goto nla_put_failure;
-		if (nla_put_string(skb, NFTA_TRACE_TABLE,
-				   info->chain->table->name))
-			goto nla_put_failure;
-	}
+	if (nla_put_string(skb, NFTA_TRACE_CHAIN, info->chain->name))
+		goto nla_put_failure;
+
+	if (nla_put_string(skb, NFTA_TRACE_TABLE, info->chain->table->name))
+		goto nla_put_failure;
 
 	if (nf_trace_fill_rule_info(skb, info))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
-- 
2.1.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux