Re: [nft PATCH 1/2] monitor: Rewrite SETELEM callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:06:05PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> +static int netlink_events_setelem_newgen_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> +					    int type,
> +					    struct netlink_mon_handler *monh)
> +{
> +	setelem_cache_print_default(monh);
> +
> +	return MNL_CB_OK;
>  }

I would really like we don't rely on newgen for this. If there is no
way to catch a case with the existing way we represent this, then we
probably need to fix things from the kernel.

Before we follow that patch, I would like to understand what corner
case is pushing us to use the newgen event.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux