Re: [nft PATCH 4/4] monitor: Ignore ranges' zero segment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12 July 2017 at 14:36, Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> The internal representation of ranges in a set consists of segments
> which either match or not. Each segment is identified by the lower
> boundary and simply spans till the next segment. Upon insertion,
> adjacent (matching) segments are joined into a single one, but only if
> both are new. This means that the inverse operation, namely converting
> segments back into ranges, may use the non-matching segments' lower
> boundary as range end marker. But there is one catch: If the first range
> doesn't start at zero, the first segment is a non-matching one. Code
> indicates that by EXPR_F_INTERVAL_END flag. So when monitor sees a lower
> boundary of zero with that flag set, it has to ignore it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/netlink.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/netlink.c b/src/netlink.c
> index 65c6f05a57649..8f9864129ea94 100644
> --- a/src/netlink.c
> +++ b/src/netlink.c
> @@ -2214,6 +2214,7 @@ static int netlink_events_setelem_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int type,
>         struct set *set;
>         const char *setname, *table;
>         uint32_t family;
> +       struct expr *expr;
>
>         nls = netlink_setelem_alloc(nlh);
>         table = nftnl_set_get_str(nls, NFTNL_SET_TABLE);
> @@ -2267,6 +2268,13 @@ static int netlink_events_setelem_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int type,
>                                 free(setelem_cache.table);
>                                 free(setelem_cache.setname);
>                         } else {
> +                               expr = compound_expr_last(dummyset->init);
> +
> +                               if (!mpz_cmp_ui(expr->key->value, 0) &&
> +                                   expr->flags & EXPR_F_INTERVAL_END) {
> +                                       set_free(dummyset);
> +                                       goto out;
> +                               }

This seems mostly the same than in my patch, function
netlink_event_ignore_range_event()
What I liked about having a separate function is that the code is
clear/explicit in what we are doing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux