On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:20:57AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:01:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, > > and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock > > pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific > > arch_spin_unlock_wait(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 ++++----------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > I'm going to miss this code. ;-) ;-) ;-) > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Applied, thank you! Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
