There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <adi-buildroot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/blackfin/include/asm/spinlock.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/blackfin/include/asm/spinlock.h
index c58f4a83ed6f..f6431439d15d 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/blackfin/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
__raw_spin_unlock_asm(&lock->lock);
}
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->lock, !VAL);
-}
-
static inline int arch_read_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
return __raw_uncached_fetch_asm(&rw->lock) > 0;
--
2.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
