Re: [PATCHv2] tests: shell: Add test for ambguity while setting the value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:31:00PM +0530, Shyam Saini wrote:
>> diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/sets/0023unknown_value_to_use_0 b/tests/shell/testcases/sets/0023unknown_value_to_use_0
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..ee9be68
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/shell/testcases/sets/0023unknown_value_to_use_0
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +
>> +     # This test checks bug identified and fixed in the commit Id "986dea8".
>> +     # i.e, If in a statement there are  multiple src data then it would be totally ambiguous to decide which value to set.
>> +
>> +     # Before this commit 986dea8, nft returns 134 which indicates the bug but after this commit it returns 1.
>> +     # We don't add this test in python testsuite, because there we can't detect 134 != 1 (returns code stating failure)
>> +
>> +declare -a rules=(
>> +"tcp dport set {1, 2, 3}" "udp dport set {1, 2, 3}"
>> +"meta pkttype set {unicast, multicast, broadcast}"
>> +"meta mark set {0xffff, 0xcc}"
>> +"ct mark set {0x11333, 0x11}" "ct zone set {123, 127}"
>> +"ct label set {123, 127}"
>> +"ct event set {new, related, destroy, label}"
>> +"ether daddr set {01:00:5e:00:01:01, 01:00:5e:00:02:02}"
>> +"ip saddr set {192.19.1.2, 191.1.22.1}"
>> +)
>> +
>> +$NFT add table t
>> +$NFT add chain t c
>> +
>> +for (( i = 0 ; i < ${#rules[@]} ; i++ ))
>> +do
>> +     $NFT add rule t c ${rules[$i]}
>> +     ret=$?
>> +     if [ $ret -ne 1 ];
>> +     then
>> +             echo "E: failed test: returned $ret instead of 1" >&2
>> +             exit 1
>> +     fi
>> +done
>
> Better use tests/py/ for this?

We only have "ok" and "fail" as return codes in python test suites and
we can't can't detect 134 != 1 there.
So it was added in the tests/shell/.

further we would need "*.payload" file for that respective test.

$ nft --debug=netlink add rule t c udp dport set {1, 3}

But in our case it is not generated at all.

Is it right ?

Please correct me

Thanks,
shyam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux