On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:13:58AM +0200, Alin Nastac wrote:
>> From: Alin Nastac <alin.nastac@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The remaining %llu formats are used for unsigned long long values.
>
> Hm, still problems here:
>
> libxt_hashlimit.c: In function ‘hashlimit_mt_print’:
> libxt_hashlimit.c:739:3: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘__u64’ [-Wformat=] printf(" burst %"PRIu64, cfg->burst);
> printf(" burst %"PRIu64, cfg->burst);
> ^
> libxt_hashlimit.c: In function ‘hashlimit_mt_save’:
> libxt_hashlimit.c:849:3: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘__u64’ [-Wformat=]
> printf(" --hashlimit-burst %"PRIu64, cfg->burst);
On second thought, seems that "%"PRIu64 is equivalent in your case
with "%lu". Maybe it is better to replace all %"PRIu64" with %llu.
After all, uint64_t is supposed to be unsigned long long on all
architectures, isn't it so?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
