Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't find it ugly, but alternatively we could add a new type of info > > sent at the beginning of the commit phase (before all the table/rule etc > > updates) and include it there. > > You mean as a separate netlink message? Then we would have to map that > message to the actual notification, no? Or do you think it's sufficient > to cache the last PID/name received and use it for the monitor messages > until an update to them comes in? I didn't check yet but all the notifications should contain the current generation id and we also send a genid update after a transaction is done so I suspect its enough to emit the name once per transaction. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
