Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 02:34:21PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Being able to retrieve an added rule's handle atomically is a crucial
> > feature for scripts invoking nft command: Without it, there is no way to
> > be sure a handle extracted from 'nft list ruleset' command actually
> > refers to the rule one has added before or that of another process which
> > ran in between.
> >
> > Extracting an added rule's handle itself is not an easy task already,
> > since there is a chance that a given rule is printed differently than
> > when it was added before. A simple example is port number vs. service
> > name:
> >
> > | nft add rule ip t c tcp dport { ssh, 80 } accept
> >
> > There is no way to make 'nft list ruleset' return the rule just like
> > this as depending on whether '-nn' was given or not, it either prints
> > the set as '{ ssh, http }' or '{ 22, 80 }' but never in the mixed form
> > that was used when adding it.
> >
> > This patch prints an identifying string for each added rule which may be
> > used as single parameter to a later 'nft delete rule' command. So a
> > simple scripting example looks like this:
> >
> > | handle=$(nft add rule ip t c counter)
>
> This is a hack.
>
> We should follow the rule description path.
You mean delete-by-name?
Its just as ugly, just a different kind of ugly.
Will you delete the first match? The last one? All of them?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
