Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2017-04-15 18:26 GMT+08:00 Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>: > [...] > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS > > + case NFT_CT_EVENTMASK: { > > + struct nf_conntrack_ecache *e = nf_ct_ecache_find(ct); > > + u16 ctmask = nft_reg_load16(®s->data[priv->sreg]); > > Hmm, I find that in nft utility, this ctmask is defined as a 32 bit value. Right, it was deliberate to not have to extend it later on in case we get more event values in future. > So using nft_reg_load16 maybe wrong. In order to avoid ambiguity, > I think it's better to convert it to "u32 ctmask = regs->data[priv->sreg];". Agree, thats what I'll do, thanks Liping. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html