Hi Florian,
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:31:08PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
[...]
> resurrect an old patch from Pablo Neira to remove the untracked objects.
Thanks for doing so :)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> index 6a8e33dd4ecb..b4a0a1940118 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ enum ip_conntrack_info {
> /* only for userspace compatibility */
> #ifndef __KERNEL__
> IP_CT_NEW_REPLY = IP_CT_NUMBER,
> +#else
> + IP_CT_UNTRACKED = 7,
This seems to be exposed via nfnetlink_queue conntrack support.
> @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ enum ip_conntrack_status {
> IPS_TEMPLATE_BIT = 11,
> IPS_TEMPLATE = (1 << IPS_TEMPLATE_BIT),
>
> - /* Conntrack is a fake untracked entry */
> + /* Conntrack is a fake untracked entry. Obsolete and not used anymore */
> IPS_UNTRACKED_BIT = 12,
> IPS_UNTRACKED = (1 << IPS_UNTRACKED_BIT),
I wonder if we should just set this via ctnetlink, so the interface
keeps stable. Even if we don't use this bit anymore. These are also
exposed via ctnetlink CTA_STATUS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
