Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: cttimeout: Fix one possible use-after-free issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:13:40AM +0800, gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The function ctnl_untimeout is used to untimeout every conntrack
> which is using the timeout. But it is necessary to add one barrier
> synchronize_rcu because of racing. Maybe one conntrack has already
> owned this timeout, but it is not inserted into unconfirmed list or
> the hash list, when ctnl_untimeout untimeout the conntracks
> 
> Let me describe it with a call path
> CPU1				CPU2
> alloc new conn
> add timeout ext
> 				ctnl_timeout_try_del
> 				untimeout all conns in list
> 				kfree_rcu.
> conn is confirmed.

Then this confirmed conn gets a timeout_ext->timeout == NULL since
ctnl_untimeout() is called first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux