[nft PATCH 1/2] evaluate: set: Allow for set elems to be sets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Recursive use of sets is handled in parts by parser_bison.y, which
has a rule for inline unnamed sets in set_list_member_expr, e.g. like
this:

| add rule ip saddr { { 1.1.1.0, 2.2.2.0 }, 3.3.3.0 }

Yet there is another way to have an unnamed set inline, which is via
define:

| define myset = {
| 	1.1.1.0,
| 	2.2.2.0,
| }
| add rule ip saddr { $myset, 3.3.3.0 }

This didn't work because the inline set comes in as EXPR_SET_ELEM with
EXPR_SET as key. This patch handles that case by replacing the former by
a copy of the latter, so the following set list merging can take place.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
---
 src/evaluate.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 8fb716c062449..86ff8ebd17629 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -1132,6 +1132,15 @@ static int expr_evaluate_set(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
 			return expr_error(ctx->msgs, i,
 					  "Set reference cannot be part of another set");
 
+		if (i->ops->type == EXPR_SET_ELEM &&
+		    i->key->ops->type == EXPR_SET) {
+			struct expr *new = expr_clone(i->key);
+
+			list_replace(&i->list, &new->list);
+			expr_free(i);
+			i = new;
+		}
+
 		if (!expr_is_constant(i))
 			return expr_error(ctx->msgs, i,
 					  "Set member is not constant");
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux