On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:26:20PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: [...] > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:10:04PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > The following series adds two distinct features to nftables, though > > > since the second one depends on presence of the first one this is > > > submitted as a series. > > > > > > Patch 1 adds support for a boolean variant of relational expression. > > > It's OP is strictly implicit and determined by RHS being a boolean > > > expression. It depends on a related kernel patch adding support for > > > NFT_CMP_BOOL to nft_cmp.c. > > > > If the problem is that we lack of context from the delinearize path, > > then I would prefer if you scratch one bit from the fib flags to > > indicate that we want a true (1)/false (0) return value. Just like we > > plan to do with exthdr. This should require a small kernel patch for > > nft_fib I think. > > > > Thus, we can skip this ad hoc update for nft_cmp which seems to me > > that it's only there to help us get the context that we lack from the > > delinearize step. > > This is not ad hoc updating nft_cmp but instead support for a new > operation. Did you maybe reply having the first approach from my RFC in > mind? Because I scratched that and went with the second one since it's > more complete. I think nft_cmp kernel doesn't need the specific boolean operation, this is something that belongs to userspace. The existing kernel code already allows us to match 0 and 1 which is sufficient for what we need. > > Then, from the delinearize path, if this fib/exthdr flag is set, we > > attach the corresponding datatype to the expression based on this new > > flag. > > The point in NFT_CMP_BOOL is that it's LHS expression agnostic. Whatever > provides a value there can be checked for being eq/neq zero using the > boolean operation. > > The context use in delinearize path is implicit (LHS defines RHS dtype) > and for convenience only: It merely allows printing different "flavors" > of boolean keywords depending on LHS and could easily be dropped. I think we already have the context depending on the delinearize path we follow, ie. netlink_delinearize_fib() may attach flavour A of boolean, while netlink_delinearize_exthdr() attaches flavour B. BTW, I would actually prefer to avoid flavouring at this stage, isn't it found / not found enough for the usecase we have so far? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
