Re: tcp state in conntrack destroy events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Victor Julien <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was hoping to get the last TCP state in a conntrack destroy event,
> however it seems to be unavailable.
> 
> Through libnetfilter_conntrack the value retrieved at ATTR_TCP_STATE is
> always 0.
> 
> Using the conntrack command I see the same behavior:
> 
> destroy doesn't have it (conntrack -E -e destroy -p tcp):
> 
> [DESTROY] tcp      6 src=218.65.30.38 dst=192.168.178.254 sport=61063
> dport=22 packets=11 bytes=820 src=192.168.0.123 dst=218.65.30.38
> sport=22 dport=61063 packets=8 bytes=424 [ASSURED] mark=3 delta-time=77
> 
> update does (conntrack -E -e updates -p tcp):
> 
>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 FIN_WAIT src=192.168.0.53 dst=x.x.x.x
> sport=52958 dport=443 src=x.x.x.x dst=192.168.178.254 sport=443
> dport=52958 [ASSURED] mark=3
> 
> Is this intentional? My goal is to create connection log that includes a
> hint about why the connection is gone.

Yes, its intentional, see
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c, there is a check for DESTROY
that supresses most of the extra info:

682 if (events & (1 << IPCT_DESTROY)) {
683    if (ctnetlink_dump_acct(skb, ct, type) < 0 ||
684        ctnetlink_dump_timestamp(skb, ct) < 0)
685           goto nla_put_failure;
686    } else {
..
	/* IPCT_PROTOINFO */

Pablo made this change in 7b621c1ea64a54f77b8a841b16dc4c9fee3ecf48,
i guess the rationale was that clients aren't interested in this
on DESTROY.

Would be easy to change this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux