From: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx> The return value of nf_tables_obj_lookup is valid pointer or one error. There are two cases in nf_tables_newobj totally. case1: return value is -ENOENT, the obj is NULL, it is unnecessary to perform the latter check "obj != NULL". case2: IS_ERR(obj) is false, the obj is one valid pointer. It is also unnecessary to perform that check. In summary, we could move the block of condition check "obj != NULL" in the else block to erase the original condition check. Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index a019a87..bc55086 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -4154,9 +4154,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, return err; obj = NULL; - } - - if (obj != NULL) { + } else { if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) return -EEXIST; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html