Re: nft segfaults listing huge sets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nftables: 0.7
kernel: 4.8 and 4.9.

02.01.2017 11:12, Oleksandr Natalenko написав:
/* Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to ML */

Hello.

I'm trying to replace ipset+iptables setup with pure nft for 200+
thousand of subnets.

For the list of subnets I create a set in a file:

===
add table inet filter
add set inet filter p2p-paranoid { type ipv4_addr; flags interval; }
add element inet filter p2p-paranoid {
1.0.4.0/22,
1.0.64.0/18,
...
here goes 200+ thousand of lines
...
223.255.128.0/18,
223.255.241.132,
}
===

Then I apply this file by "nft -f file". This works fine.

Then I try to list ruleset with "nfs list ruleset", but get segfault:

===
Starting program: /usr/bin/nft list ruleset

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000041ef06 in interval_map_decompose (set=0x6f26080) at segtree.c:617
617     segtree.c: No such file or directory.
#0  0x000000000041ef06 in interval_map_decompose (set=0x6f26080) at
segtree.c:617
#1  0x0000000000418449 in netlink_get_setelems
(ctx=ctx@entry=0x7fffffff5260, h=h@entry=0x65caa0,
loc=0x43cf00 <internal_location>, set=set@entry=0x65ca90) at netlink.c:1603
#2  0x0000000000408119 in cache_init_objects (cmd=CMD_LIST,
ctx=0x7fffffff5260) at rule.c:84
#3  cache_init (msgs=0x7fffffffe400, cmd=CMD_LIST) at rule.c:130
#4 cache_update (cmd=cmd@entry=CMD_LIST, msgs=0x7fffffffe400) at rule.c:147
#5  0x0000000000411717 in cmd_evaluate_list (cmd=0x65c730,
ctx=0x7fffffffe9f8) at evaluate.c:2793
#6 cmd_evaluate (ctx=ctx@entry=0x7fffffffe9f8, cmd=0x65c730) at evaluate.c:3048
#7  0x000000000042849d in nft_parse (scanner=scanner@entry=0x65c4b0,
state=state@entry=0x7fffffffe410) at parser_bison.y:626
#8  0x00000000004064c6 in nft_run (scanner=scanner@entry=0x65c4b0,
state=state@entry=0x7fffffffe410,
    msgs=msgs@entry=0x7fffffffe400) at main.c:230
#9  0x00000000004069c2 in main (argc=<optimized out>,
argv=0x7fffffffec48) at main.c:361
===

The same applies to "nft flush ruleset".

According to strace, it seems, nft runs out of stack. Here is the tail
of strace output:

===
brk(0x10b7c000)                         = 0x10b7c000
brk(0x10b9d000)                         = 0x10b9d000
brk(0x10bbe000)                         = 0x10bbe000
brk(0x10bdf000)                         = 0x10bdf000
brk(0x10c00000)                         = 0x10c00000
brk(0x10c21000)                         = 0x10c21000
brk(0x10c42000)                         = 0x10c42000
brk(0x10c63000)                         = 0x10c63000
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0x7fffb6554b18} ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
===

The amount of brk() calls is ~1900.

Could that be addressed, and should I provide more info?

Thanks.

Regards,
  Oleksandr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux