On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:37:47PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:22:24 +0200 > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:21:04AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > >> This prevents the modification of nf_conntrack_max in unprivileged network > >> namespaces. For unprivileged network namespaces, ip_conntrack_max is kept > >> as a readonly sysctl in order to minimize potential compatibility issues. > >> > >> This patch should apply cleanly to the net tree. > > > > For the record: This patch looks good to me, but this legacy > > ip_conntrack sysctl code is now gone. > > > > I don't know what is the procedure to get this to -stable branches now > > that this cannot be pushed upstream. > > In the commit message for the -stable submission simply say "Not > applicable" in the upstream commit reference. Like: > > [ Upstream commit: Not applicable ] > > or something like that. Who should do that? Me, after getting a maintainer ack? Or the maintainer?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
